Last week, 102 Democrats in the House co-signed a letter saying that they will oppose any deficit reduction package that includes cuts to Social Security benefits.
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Last week, 102 Democrats in the House co-signed a letter saying that they will oppose any deficit reduction package that includes cuts to Social Security benefits.
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Friday, December 14, 2012
Thursday, December 13, 2012
While the President and Senate Democrats have been firm about ending the Bush tax cuts for the top 2% during the fiscal showdown, there are discussions behind closed doors to cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid in the name of a compromise.
A cut to any of our earned benefits is a betrayal of the millions of Americans who earned and depend on those benefits.
Here's what you can do:
- Click here to go to MoveOn.org's No Benefits Cuts page.
- Find your Senator(s) in the lists either as a champion, wavering, or weak-kneed.
- Click on your Senator and call the number provided. If your Senator is not listed, call Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
- Submit their response in the form on the page.
There is pressure coming from inside Washington to make a deal for the sake of a deal. We need your voice to block a bad deal.
Calling only takes a few minutes, and by getting every Democrat on record we can force them to defend our earned benefits.
Thank you for your support,
Social Security Works
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
December 12, 2012
(please forward far and wide)
Possible agreement on VAWA just hours away
Urgent that all VAWA advocates make one more phone call!
Call immediately and talk to Speaker Boehner's 202-225-0600 or 202.225.6205 and House Majority Leader Cantor's office 202-225-2815 or 202. 225.4000 and emphatically urge them to "Be a hero and help pass a VAWA that includes ALL victims and survivors. Your leadership can make this happen." Then let them know that a final VAWA that does not protect Native women and does not hold perpetrators accountable is unacceptable.
Right now, House leadership is in talks with VAWA's Senate champions to discuss VAWA. There is a path to bipartisan passage that protects and provides justice for all victims – including Native American women. Our country must stand to protect all victims. Under current law, Native victims face dire and life-threatening violence on Tribal lands at the hands of non-Native offenders who cannot be prosecuted by tribal courts. The National Task Force is unwilling to support a bill that leaves any victims out. It's important for us to tell Republicans that we will stand with them if they do the right thing.
VAWA has bipartisan support and in recent days, dozens of Republican members of Congress have offered real solutions and solid support for the provisions that include all victims. Last week, Congressmen Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Tom Cole (R-OK) introduced H.R. 6625, a stand-alone bill which contains compromise language to address Republican concerns that the tribal jurisdiction over non tribal defendants is unconstitutional. These good faith efforts to find common ground and a path forward must not be dismissed.
CALL immediately to Speaker Boehner's 202-225-0600 or 202.225.6205 and House Majority Leader Cantor's office 202-225-2815 or 202. 225.4000 and strongly urge House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Speaker Boehner to seize the moment and get this bill done with the compromise tribal jurisdictional provisions intact. This is their opportunity to be leaders in all of this and we are prayerful and optimistic that they will put politics aside and pass a VAWA inclusive of those thus far left behind. House leadership needs to hear loud and clear that now is the time to pass a VAWA for all victims—Native women included. And they need to also hear that a VAWA which does not protect Native women and does not hold perpetrators accountable is unacceptable.
All victims of violence – including Native Women - cannot afford to wait another year for justice.
For your light reading:
in the states:
Monday, December 10, 2012
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Dear New York MoveOn member,
The middle class has been bearing the burden of our nation's economic struggles—we should not also bear the burden of the trickle-down deficit. Our social safety net is sacred. Tax fairness is the American way. Investing in jobs and middle class wages is the true priority of the day.
That's why I created a petition on SignOn.org to our U.S. Senator, Charles Schumer, which says:
Senator Schumer, we urge you to stand up for us and future generations and make sure any fiscal deal reached ends the Bush tax cuts for the top 2% AND protects Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits from any cuts. This is what we voted for in November, and we expect you, our elected official, to vote the same way.
Saturday, December 8, 2012
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is a shadow organization, a corrupt collection of corporations that's had its hand in everything from the Great Recession to our failure to address climate change.
Now Chamber members like Walmart are trying to buy the November elections – and if Google wants to keep our business, it needs to cut ties with the organization threatening our democracy.
With plans to spend up to $100 million dollars influencing who gets into office this fall, this organization's meddling is set to have a disastrous effect on our economy, our environment and our everyday lives.
But we have the power to change that.
Over the past five years, more and more companies have been leaving the COC over its opposition to climate legislation, its widespread corruption, and its backing for anti-Internet proposals like SOPA and PIPA. We've already gotten Apple, Nike and Yahoo to leave – now let's get Google to leave, too.
The Chamber's corporate backers like the power the organization gives them – but they won't like being associated with buying elections, violating our rights and destroying the environment. Let Google know how much it stands to lose by staying – tell CEO Larry Page to pull Google from the Chamber of Commerce now!
MESSAGE TO LARRY PAGE: The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is a threat to our democracy. We urge you to end your membership now, before we leave your company for one that has.
-- The folks at Watchdog.net
P.S. If the other links aren't working for you, please go here to sign: http://act.watchdog.net/petitions/1368?n=6005980.WPture
Friday, December 7, 2012
December 6, 2012
The Nation.com Blog
Two news reports yesterday shed new light on Walmart's
relationship to the Bangladesh factory where at least 112
workers died in a November 24 fire. One shows Walmart's role
in defeating a proposal for retail corporations to pay for
safety improvements; the other shows that multiple Walmart
suppliers used the factory this year.
"Walmart's efforts to evade accountability make a mockery of
its pretensions to be committed to protecting the rights of
workers in its supply chain," said Scott Nova, the executive
director of the Workers Rights Consortium, in an e-mail to
The Nation. Walmart did not respond to a request for comment
late last night.
In a Wednesday morning article, Bloomberg News reported an
April 2011 meeting in Dhaka, Bangladesh, at which major
retail corporations considered a proposed agreement under
which they would pay more so that their suppliers could make
safety improvements. Ineke Zeldenrust of the Amsterdam-based
NGO Clean Clothes Campaign told Bloomberg that Walmart's
director of ethical sourcing, Sridevi Kalavakolanu, said at
the meeting that Walmart would not agree to pay the higher
Bloomberg reporters Renee Dudley and Arun Devnath also
revealed a document written by Kalavakolanu and a Gap
official, which was included in the meeting's minutes, which
stated, "Specifically to the issue of any corrections on
electrical and fire safety, we are talking about 4,500
factories, and in most cases very extensive and costly
modifications would need to be undertaken to some factories.
It is not financially feasible for the brands to make such
Zeldenrust, the Clean Clothes Campaign's international
coordinator, told the New York Times' Steven Greenhouse that
Walmart was the company that "most strongly advocated this
position." The 2011 meeting followed dozens of deaths in
Bangladesh factory fires. The Tazreen factory in Bangladesh,
the site of last month's deadly fire, had limited fire exits
and no fire escapes.
"No company," Nova told The Nation, "that is unwilling to
pay [factories] enough to make it possible for them to
operate safely can claim to be interested in any way in the
rights or safety of workers."
The Times article, also published Wednesday, revealed that
at least three supplier companies were using the Tazreen
factory during the past year to provide apparel for Walmart
and its subsidiary Sam's Club. According to Greenhouse, the
documents "include an internal production report from mid-
September showing that 5 of the factory's 14 production
lines were devoted to making apparel for Walmart." Another
Bloomberg article by Dudley yesterday reported that at least
five Walmart suppliers used the Tazreen factory.
These articles may draw renewed scrutiny to Walmart's
account of its role in the factory and the Bangladesh
apparel industry. As The Nation has reported, following the
November 24 fire, Walmart initially said it could not
confirm that it had ever sourced apparel from the Tazreen
factory, and could not confirm the authenticity of a
document found on the website of Tazreen's parent company,
Tuba Group, which showed that a Walmart audit had uncovered
"higher-risk violations" in the factory in May 2011. Photos
taken by Bangladeshi labor activists, first published by The
Nation on November 26, showed Walmart-branded clothing
present in the factory after the fire.
In an evening statement November 26, Walmart said that it
had suspended the Tazreen Factory prior to the fire, but a
supplier had continued filing orders there on Walmart's
behalf in violation of Walmart's decision. Walmart called
the incident "extremely troubling," said that it had
terminated the rogue supplier, and again touted its ongoing
"work across the apparel industry to improve fire safety
education and training in Bangladesh." Following the
statement, Walmart declined The Nation's request for comment
regarding the identity of the supplier and when the factory
ceased to be authorized.
The WRC's Nova, who provided the documents to the Times,
told The Nation that they clearly establish that there were
multiple Walmart suppliers using the Tazreen Factory as
recently as April of this year, and at least one when the
fire broke out. He added that there are "strong indications
in the documents, but short of certain, that it was still
multiple suppliers at the time of the fire," rather than the
single rogue supplier implied by Walmart's statement. The
WRC is a labor monitoring group whose board is composed of
students, university administrators, and labor
organizations. (Some of the Tazreen documents are posted
below; they were provided to The Nation by the Corporate
Action Network, which also posted them on its own website.)
Nova also called Walmart's role in the 2011 Dhaka meeting
"especially revealing." He described Walmart's position as
"1) We know these factories are unsafe. 2) We know it will
cost substantial sums to make them safe. 3) We are not going
to pay for this. 4) We are going to keep using the factories
Walmart's senior director for international corporate
affairs, Kevin Gardner, told the Times that the 2011
comments from the company's ethical sourcing director had
been taken "out of context" and that "Walmart has been
advocating for improved fire safety with the Bangladeshi
government, with industry groups and with suppliers."
Regarding the documents showing multiple suppliers active in
the factory this year, Gardner told Greenhouse, "As we've
said the Tazreen factory was deauthorized months ago. We
don't comment on specific supplier relationships."
The Corporate Action Network, which helped organize Black
Friday protests in support of US Walmart retail workers, has
posted resources on its website encouraging activists to
"end deathtraps for Walmart workers" by signing a petition,
writing a letter to the editor, and installing a "memorial
shrine to the victims of the Tazreen factory fire at a
Walmart near you." Some US retail workers in union-backed
group OUR Walmart are raising money and holding prayer
services for the families affected by the fire in
"Walmart's greed and arrogance appear to be boundless," said
Nova. This is a company that siphons billions in subsidies
from US taxpayers, that has made billions in profits on the
backs of Bangladeshi workers, then scoffs at the notion that
it should be asked to pay one dime to protect those workers
from dying in factory fires while they sew Walmart clothes."
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Where: Senator Schumer's office in midtown (in Manhattan)
When: Monday, Dec. 10, at 5:00 PM
Can you come?
Click below for more details and to RSVP:
|Yes, I'll be there!|
|I can't make it.|
P.S. Can't make this event? Click here to find another event near you.
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
By Claire Mc Cormack
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
The lame-duck Congress has two weeks left to renew the Violence Against Women Act. Safety advocates say new data about a stunning drop in intimate-partner violence is good reason for lawmakers to speed passage.
NEW YORK (WOMENSENEWS)--Women's safety advocates welcome last's week's report of a steep and long-term decline in intimate-partner violence in the United States and say it's a good reason for lawmakers to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act before the end of the year.
"It doesn't surprise me that intimate-partner violence cases have declined dramatically," said Kim Gandy, CEO of the National Network to End Domestic Violence, in a phone interview.
"These numbers prove that the Violence Against Women Act is working and effective," Gandy added, referring to a 1994 law enacted with bipartisan support that provides critical services for survivors of sexual assault and domestic violence.
The Bureau of Justice Statistics' Nov. 27 report indicates a national overall decline of 64 percent in nonfatal intimate-partner violence between 1993 and 2010. Cases fell to 907,000 in 2010 from 2.1 million in 1993.
The figures included rape, sexual assault, robbery, aggravated assault and simple assault committed by a spouse, former spouse, boyfriends or girlfriend. They were collected from the agency's annual household survey of personal victimization over a 17-year period. Homicide was not included.
Discussion of renewal is now with the House of Representatives and supporters of the Violence Against Women Act are concerned that, with two weeks left, the law may be allowed to expire.
"The opportunity is now before the end of the year," said Gandy. "Women shouldn't have to wait another day."
On the Agenda
Renewal of the bill is on the agenda for Congress now that the election is over.
In April, a version of the Violence Against Women Act was approved by the Senate, despite strong Republican opposition to certain provisions, such as expanding protections to same-sex couples, continuing to allow victims who are undocumented immigrants to claim temporary visas and permitting Native American rape victims to prosecute their non-Indian assailants. The latest version in the House also would expand free legal assistance to victims of domestic violence and extend the definition of violence against women to include stalking. Republican House members remain opposed to these provisions.
Gandy, a former prosecutor of violent offenders, said government investment and funding had helped ensure more safety for women. "It's money well spent and hugely increases coordination in communities to support victims, advocates, prosecutors and the courts."
Liz Roberts, chief program officer of the New York-based victims' services agency Safe Horizon, said the numbers are encouraging and a credit to domestic violence advocates, law enforcement and public and private funders.
"But domestic violence remains a serious and pervasive threat to the health and well-being of women and children in this country," said Roberts. "For the reason of these findings, we urge all members of Congress to join together to pass the Senate version of the Violence Against Women Act."
One in every four women will suffer domestic violence in her lifetime, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Claire Mc Cormack is a reporter based in Dublin and New York.
Tell Congress on Wed, Dec. 5:
NO CUTS to Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid
December 4, 2012
Please take a minute to use the toll-free number below -- as we join with our coalition partner, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare -- to make sure Congress hears our message loud and clear.
NO CUTS to Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid
Call on Wed 12/5: 1-800-998-0180
After a lifetime of unequal pay, women rely disproportionately on Social Security and Medicare in their retirement years. Medicaid is equally crucial for women, providing health coverage to some 10 million women last year alone.
Yet Republican leaders in Congress are insisting that these programs be cut substantially rather than allowing the Bush-era tax cuts to expire for the wealthiest. Very little time remains in this lame duck session for negotiations over the so-called fiscal cliff to conclude before an automatic across-the-board cut to all federal programs goes into effect.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has said that Social Security is NOT on the table in these discussions because the system is self-financed and by law cannot contribute to the federal debt.
However, we have heard that conservatives in Congress want to impose a change in the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), altering the way that Social Security benefits are calculated to keep up with inflation. Conservatives want to switch to an index called the "chained CPI," which would, in fact, result in a serious reduction in Social Security benefits. The average 65-year-old Social Security beneficiary would lose about $130 in benefits the first year, but by the time that senior is 95, the amount would be $1,400. For many elderly women, Social Security is their ONLY source of income, and such a reduction would be disastrous.
Please call on Wed 12/5 and tell your member of Congress to oppose the chained CPI and keep Social Security out of the fiscal cliff discussion.
In addition, conservative legislators and corporate-backed advocacy groups are pressuring negotiators for a range of harmful changes to Medicare, including increasing the Medicare eligibility age to 67, imposing a spending cap, or means-testing Medicare benefits.
NOW and our allies strongly oppose these changes to the structure of Medicare, as they would eventually force middle- and lower-income families to shoulder the lion's share of deficit reduction while the wealthiest continue to avoid paying their fair share in income taxes. Moreover, these dangerous cuts are not necessary: When the Affordable Care Act is fully implemented, controls on provider reimbursements will go into effect and other reforms will be made to control costs without denying health care services to seniors.
Finally, the most important health care program for low-income women and their families is being targeted. Three-quarters of Medicaid beneficiaries are women; the program provides their only source of reproductive health care and it supports the vast majority of nursing home residents who are women. Absolutely NO cuts should be made to this vital program.
Please tell Congress that NO CUTS to Medicare or Medicaid should be part of the debt and deficit agreements, and that Social Security should not even be considered in debt or deficit talks. Women are depending on Congress to protect these programs!
Monday, December 3, 2012
From India, a Western Abortion Law Looks Deadly
Monday, December 3, 2012
Friday, November 30, 2012
"I went to the mall, and a little girl called me a terrorist.
My name is Ela. I am seventeen years old. I am not Muslim, but my friend told m
My friend and I pinned scarves around our heads, and then we went to the mall. Normally, vendors try to get us to buy things and ask us to sample a snack. Clerks usually ask us if we need help, tell us about sales, and smile at us. Not today. People, including vendors, clerks, and other shoppers, wouldn't look at us. They didn't talk to us. They acted like we didn't exist. They didn't want to be caught staring at us, so they didn't look at all.
And then, in one store, a girl (who looked about four years old) asked her mom if my friend and I were terrorists. She wasn't trying to be mean or anything. I don't even think she could have grasped the idea of prejudice. However, her mother's response is one I can never forgive or forget. The mother hushed her child, glared at me, and then took her daughter by the hand and led her out of the store.
All that because I put a scarf on my head. Just like that, a mother taught her little girl that being Muslim was evil. It didn't matter that I was a nice person. All that mattered was that I looked different. That little girl may grow up and teach her children the same thing.
This experiment gave me a huge wake-up call. It lasted for only a few hours, so I can't even begin to imagine how much prejudice Muslim girls go through every day. It reminded me of something that many people know but rarely remember: the women in hijabs are people, just like all those women out there who aren't Muslim."
The National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI) is pleased to offer the opportunity for students and young professionals to attend our 25th Annual Policy Research Conference, Medicare and Social Security in a Time of Budget Austerity, taking place January 31-February 1, 2013 in Washington, DC. NASI will select up to six conference scholars, who will each receive a complimentary conference registration, roundtrip transportation to Washington, DC, and lodging for up to two evenings. More details about the conference and the terms of the award are outlined on NASI's conference webpage. Please share this announcement with anyone who may be interested in this opportunity.
About the Conference
NASI's 25thAnnual Policy Research Conference, Medicare and Social Security in a Time of Budget Austerity, will be an interdisciplinary gathering of several hundred policy analysts and researchers, congressional staff, labor union representatives, advocates, industry leaders, federal employees and other individuals working in the field of social insurance. Conference Scholars will hear the latest developments in the social insurance field from a range of policy, research, advocacy, and business leaders.View the agenda online to learn more about conference sessions and keynotes.
- Young professionals in the first five years of their career, or students 18 years or older are eligible to apply.
- Policy debates about the future of social insurance benefit from diverse perspectives that are representative of the country's varied demographics. For that reason, NASI encourages applicants from diverse backgrounds—including but not limited to individuals who represent different groups as defined by race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic background, ability/disability, and geographic location—to apply.
- NASI members and associate members are not eligible to apply. In general, preference will be given to applicants who have yet to attend a NASI event or conference.
Applications are due by 5:00 pm, Wednesday, December 12, 2012.
Visit the conference scholarship page on NASI's website for more information and an application form.
**P.S. Don't forget: The early bird deadline to register for the NASI conference is November 30. After forwarding this email to students and young professionals you think would be interested, register for the conference online today.**
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Can you call your members of Congress? Tell them:
"Don't back any fiscal deal unless it lets the Bush tax cuts for the top 2% expire on December 31 and doesn't cut Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits."
They've fabricated a story that, somehow, our economy will fall apart if they don't get what they want. It's not true, but negotiations are underway and a "deal" could come together at any time.
This is a crucial moment—before a deal emerges—when we need our leaders to stand strong. Can you call your members of Congress and tell them:
"Don't back any fiscal deal unless it lets the Bush tax cuts for the top 2% expire, as scheduled, on December 31 and doesn't cut Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits."
Here's where to call:
Then, please report your call by clicking here:
Today, in addition to all our calls, tens of thousands of MoveOn members are dropping off letters at the local offices of every member of Congress. Every call helps amplify the message—and we need to make Congress understand that we won't stand for a bad fiscal deal.
The truth is that nothing drastic will happen to our economy on January 1. The House can simply vote to extend tax cuts to 98% of Americans—as the Senate has already done. It's that easy. The only reason there's even a debate over cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits right now is that Republicans know they'll lose all their leverage if the Bush tax cuts expire as scheduled.
The whole election was about whether the rich should pay their fair share or whether to give them more tax breaks and cut into our safety net—and WE won.
Can you call your members of Congress right now and tell them to stand up for the will of the American people?
Here are the numbers again:
Then, please report your call by clicking here:
Thanks for all you do.
–Ilya, Robin, Mark, Victoria, and the rest of the team
P.S. New districts and newly-elected members of Congress don't go into effect until January, so the information above is still current.
Want to support our work? We're entirely funded by our 7 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. Chip in here.
Monday, November 26, 2012
The sheer awesomeness of Emotional Creature truly floored me. Walking out of the theater, I was at a loss for words and just kept repeating, “That was brilliant. That was brilliant. That was brilliant.” The play certainly was absolutely brilliant, and extremely well-made. It featured six extremely talented women actors, all of whom played different characters in various scenes. They delivered a powerful message about the state of girls today, from upper-middle class Midwestern America to the exploitative factories of China. Although Emotional Creature dealt with some very serious topics, humor was sprinkled throughout the show, creating some comic relief and an interesting contrast.
The fact that the show had true multiculturalism really appealed to me. Of the six cast members, two were African-American, one was Asian-American, one was Middle Eastern, and two were white. The subject matter dealt with issues from almost every continent, from female genital mutilation in Africa to being accepted by the popular crowd in North America. Although Emotional Creature really celebrated diversity, my mother picked up on the fact that all the actors were all relatively thin. The heaviest actor was only around a size eight. Considering the show had a whole scene dedicated to body image and eating disorders, it’s surprising that all of the actors that were cast had a similar, thin build.
Another thing I really liked was how Emotional Creature equated Western girls’ problems with international issues. When I heard Ensler’s speech at the NOW conference about her work helping African survivors of violence rebuild their lives, I felt almost guilty for being so concerned about issues like equal pay and the glass ceiling. Like, how can I be worried about women entering the Senate when there are women out there who are subjected to horrendous violence on a daily basis? The contrast is so stark. So, I really appreciated that Emotional Creature spent just as much time on the social pressures Western girls feel to live up to their parents’ expectations as it did on sex trafficking in Eastern Europe. While sex trafficking is clearly a lot worse than feeling obligated to be perfect for your parents, everything is relative to those going through it.
Although Emotional Creature is an hour and a half long, it felt like a few minutes had gone by when the lights went down. Both my mother and I wished there was a second act, since the first part was so fascinating and informative. The play was truly an inside look on the secret life of girls, exploring the emotions girls feel and the unique situations that only girls live through.
In addition to writing plays, Eve Ensler is a feminist activist who created V-Girls, a youth-driven movement dedicated to empower girls around the world inspired by Emotional Creature. I know that I was rallied to action by seeing the show, and I hope that I wrote a good enough review to make you want to get off the Internet and improve women’s lives, too! For ideas on how to take action, check out the V-Girlswebsite. Ensler also created V-Day and its One Billion Rising campaign. One in three women on the planet will be raped or beaten, and that is absolutely unacceptable. To protest this senseless violence, women and those who love them will rise on February 14, 2013, moving the earth and activating individuals across the world. One billion women violated is one billion too much. How can we stand idly by? It is our duty to demand an end to this. If we don’t, who will?
Emotional Creature will be playing at the Romulus Linney Courtyard Theatre at the Pershing Square Signature Center through January 13. Get your tickets as soon as you can!
New Yorkers voted for change this fall, and Democrats won upset victories and a historic majority in the State Senate.
But a group of rogue Democrats is discussing an alliance with Republicans in the State Senate that would squash the progressive agenda and keep Republicans in control.
And Gov. Cuomo? He's saying he "won't get involved."
Join us in calling on Gov. Cuomo to stand up for a Democratic Senate Majority that can pass the progressive agenda we voted for.
And scroll to the bottom for details about a series of upcoming rallies throughout the state.
The Governor says he stands for progressive values. He claims to support public financing of elections, raising the minimum wage, gun control and protecting women's health.
But Republicans in the State Senate have bottled up our issues for years, or even decades!
So now, when rogue Democrats are ready to join the Republicans and throw our progressive values under the bus, why is Governor Cuomo is willing to stand by and let it happen?
This is no time to stay out of the fray – if Gov. Cuomo truly shares our values, he's got to fight for them.
Click here to tell Governor Andrew Cuomo to speak up for a Democratic Senate majority in Albany.
DETAILS ON THOSE RALLIES NEXT WEEK:
Tuesday, November 27th, 5:00pm
Rockland County Office Building
11 New Hempstead Road
New City, NY 10956
contact: Bob Milone email@example.com
Tuesday, November 27th 12:00pm
The Capital, Third Floor
In Front of Senate Lobby
Albany, NY 12230
contact: Karen Scharff firstname.lastname@example.org
New York City
Tuesday, November 27th 12:00PM
Steps of City Hall
contact: Gregory Fries email@example.com
Thursday, November 29th 11:30AM
State Office Building
333 East Washington
Syracuse, NY 13202
contact: Jesse Lenney firstname.lastname@example.org
And if you haven't already, pease consider forwarding this urgent email to your friends, and/or using these links to spread the word:
|If you're already on Facebook, click here to share with your friends.|
|If you're already on Twitter, click here to tweet about the campaign: Tweet|
Wednesday, November 21, 2012